Cyber Stalked: Book Bit 107

Here Medusa and a couple others are talking about an up-coming election and again, Medusa tosses my name into the conversation – no one else wanted to, nor did anyone else want to respond to this:

#
“At least [deleted] was never dumb enough to have LIEsinger be his mouthpiece. P.S., why can’t you pick ONE user name and stick with it??”

 

Did you catch that second sentence – the QUEEN of stupid user names asking someone else that? Maybe that whole conversation was with herself, too. Just sayin’.

 
But the mad Medusa isn’t done with her lecture just yet. This is so rich…
 

#
“It confuses people and causes others to get the blame for your opinions. For example, jmac isn’t you, but a lot of people probably think you’re both the same person. You’re also inadvertently using some aliases that people in the past have used, and they might not appreciate having your opinions attributed to them. And finally, it’s just plain old deceptive. It’s no big deal if someone uses 2 or 3 different identities, but you’ve probably used about 20+ different ones by now.”

 

Well, she ought to know, “en-so”?

 

The queen of deception tells others not to deceive. That’s rich.

 
Look who is talking.
 
And just how does she think someone feels having many, many, MANY things attributed to them that are completely false, 100 percent libelous, defamatory and as ugly as sin itself? Never mind… She’s not deep enough to think that through. Psychopaths aren’t capable of rational behavior.
 

Another “conversation” her and her alias names thought was oh-so-clever and cute:

 

01-13-2009, 12:34 PM – “I think it’s safe to say Jeni qualifies as a Sheboygan redneck.”
01-13-2009, 08:43 PM -“I’d say more hillbilly than redneck. She wouldn’t know what to do with a gun if somebody gave one to her. “
01-16-2009, 06:24 PM – “Yea, but if you give her that gun, it would be fun to see what happens.”
01-17-2009, 06:39 AM – “Can convicted felons own guns?”
01-17-2009, 10:49 AM – “Felons cannot own guns or be in possession of guns.”
01-18-2009, 09:23 AM – Even the slightest disagreement implies that she isn’t as smart as she thinks she is, so she has to remove it. It’s sad, really, because it’s obvious that she isn’t what she thinks she is…. Anyone know if she’s under the care of a psychiatrist?”

 
Note the “felon” thing – yet again? Even though she knew full well I was never a felon? After all, she splattered her favorite screen shot all over the internet – that of my TWO MISDEMEANORS 20 years ago. And even though she knew one ought NOT go around calling people felons when they are not? In her own words:
 

“If you say, ‘The mayor is a felon in my opinion,’ that’s not libelous because you make it clear it’s your opinion. If you say, ‘I know for a fact the mayor is a felon,” you had better be right because if you’re not, that’s considered libelous. That’s a statement of fact, not opinion.”

 
Wrong to call someone a felon

 
Hypocritical, malicious bitch.
 
She allowed anonymous posting – any ‘user name’ was open for grabs unless they registered and only about 10 did that – probably at least 8 of those were her and her multiple identities!
 
Someone whom I knew to be another actual person (a-hem) did make a post on Medusa’s madhouse. The young man said he had some kind of inside “scoop” on something – it was just a ploy – one that had absolutely nothing to do with me. But again, Medusa will not leave my name out of the pathetic conversation.
 

#
“Tell your big “source” to stick to licking Jeni’s jackboots.”

 

And now we have evidence that people have reached a point where they feel they must deny any association with me.

 

#
“You certainly know the “real” reason for the recall attempt was much more than a couple of mad cops. Many good people saw some big problems with [deleted] that could hurt our city and tried to stop him. Many of those problems have now come to light. These people really didn’t know Jeni then and don’t associate with her know. Your out of control hate for Jeni makes your constant attacks against the recallers unfair and unjustified. Most of them just wanted to protect Sheboygan. There is nothing wrong with that.”

 
So let’s keep harping on old Jeni…
 
Back in Book Bit 057, I talked about the person who was homeless. The one I wanted to help out. That is who Medusa is referring to with her two comments about Vicoden – only prior to this, when she wanted to use Snail to “work against me”, recall this comment of hers:
 

“She’s made a hobby of requesting open records and scouring CCAP, yet she lets a drifter/fraud/druggie/schizoid in her house and into her computer without checking him out?”

 
OR
 

 
She proceeded to say crazy, outrageous things about both myself and Snail, as if he was a big druggie and me some kind of “partner in crime”. If that wasn’t wild enough, now she back-tracks and downplays the two pills Snail was scrutinized for having in his possession.

 
And then there was this comment of Medusa’s I shared in Book Bit 054: “Jeni has associated with two criminals in the past year — both of them involved with drugs.
 

Again I say, what a hypocritical, malicious…

Bitch
 
As time goes by, it just gets worse – much worse.

Share Button

Comments are closed.